Comments on: “Socialism of the 21st Century” http://blog.shrutibhandari.com/2005/09/04/socialism-of-the-21st-century/ Tue, 06 Jan 2009 10:32:27 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1 By: shruti http://blog.shrutibhandari.com/2005/09/04/socialism-of-the-21st-century/#comment-148 shruti Wed, 02 Nov 2005 06:56:22 +0000 http://blog.shrutibhandari.com/2005/09/04/socialism-of-the-21st-century/#comment-148 Thanks for the suggestion. I add categories if I fall short of them and I do not blog according to the categories. Thanks though. :) Thanks for the suggestion.

I add categories if I fall short of them and I do not blog according to the categories.

Thanks though. :)

]]> By: nivedita http://blog.shrutibhandari.com/2005/09/04/socialism-of-the-21st-century/#comment-147 nivedita Mon, 31 Oct 2005 19:17:09 +0000 http://blog.shrutibhandari.com/2005/09/04/socialism-of-the-21st-century/#comment-147 hi Shruti, what about including some more categories of ur interest like the sports u like, the books u read. That will provide u more to write. Regards. hi Shruti,

what about including some more categories of ur interest like the sports u like, the books u read. That will provide u more to write.

Regards.

]]> By: shruti http://blog.shrutibhandari.com/2005/09/04/socialism-of-the-21st-century/#comment-18 shruti Thu, 08 Sep 2005 04:41:15 +0000 http://blog.shrutibhandari.com/2005/09/04/socialism-of-the-21st-century/#comment-18 @ 1 --> Hmmm... @ 2 --> Well, there you go. @ 3 --> Thanks. : ) @ 1—> Hmmm…
@ 2—> Well, there you go.
@ 3—> Thanks. : )

]]> By: zest http://blog.shrutibhandari.com/2005/09/04/socialism-of-the-21st-century/#comment-17 zest Tue, 06 Sep 2005 15:01:08 +0000 http://blog.shrutibhandari.com/2005/09/04/socialism-of-the-21st-century/#comment-17 and i dont like the content of your blogs recently. have become too much disorganised ... yes, its human tendency... but still...... too much superficial. do one have to write everything one "experiences"? or have to write what one "feels"? or write as much as to unfold oneself page by page, blog by blog? u want people to know u, or u just want urself to be known.... theres a difference. dont write just for the sake of it. i hope u can and will do it better. blog reader - always zest and i dont like the content of your blogs recently. have become too much disorganised … yes, its human tendency… but still…... too much superficial. do one have to write everything one “experiences”? or have to write what one “feels”? or write as much as to unfold oneself page by page, blog by blog?

u want people to know u, or u just want urself to be known…. theres a difference. dont write just for the sake of it. i hope u can and will do it better.
blog reader – always
zest

]]> By: zest http://blog.shrutibhandari.com/2005/09/04/socialism-of-the-21st-century/#comment-16 zest Tue, 06 Sep 2005 14:42:59 +0000 http://blog.shrutibhandari.com/2005/09/04/socialism-of-the-21st-century/#comment-16 thnx for not including my comment. goodbye. thnx for not including my comment.
goodbye.

]]> By: zest http://blog.shrutibhandari.com/2005/09/04/socialism-of-the-21st-century/#comment-15 zest Sun, 04 Sep 2005 14:04:36 +0000 http://blog.shrutibhandari.com/2005/09/04/socialism-of-the-21st-century/#comment-15 its not that bad.... Considering plummeting of foreign reserves in a spiral manner, the government requires more of investment. therefore these "investors" , often foreign and private banks come and buy government bonds etc.( on which recently, a cap has been put at 20%). also the second view of the government for the selling of bonds, is to give currency control to these investors and private citizens. The inflation rate is at a mammoth figure of 22.4 %, and the unemployment rate is 17.1% , both '04 figures. so instead of letting these private banks to behave like totally capitalistic entity, and making money in the time of boom( by selling their bonds), citing venezuela as an "emerging" market, the government has taken the correct step. Therefore, instead of seeing this as a step towards socialism, it should be seen as a step to reduce unemployment, increase monetary reserves and catch hold of the horse named inflation. Also rash capitalistic decisions would be avoided. its not that bad….

Considering plummeting of foreign reserves in a spiral manner, the government requires more of investment. therefore these “investors” , often foreign and private banks come and buy government bonds etc.( on which recently, a cap has been put at 20%).
also the second view of the government for the selling of bonds, is to give currency control to these investors and private citizens.

The inflation rate is at a mammoth figure of 22.4 %, and the unemployment rate is 17.1% , both ‘04 figures.

so instead of letting these private banks to behave like totally capitalistic entity, and making money in the time of boom( by selling their bonds), citing venezuela as an “emerging” market, the government has taken the correct step.

Therefore, instead of seeing this as a step towards socialism, it should be seen as a step to reduce unemployment, increase monetary reserves and catch hold of the horse named inflation. Also rash capitalistic decisions would be avoided.

]]>